Part I: Pea in a Cup 

 Written, researched, experienced by one Antonio Vacci İ1999.

Your head pounds in disbelief as you see the truth in the words, "The 'ORSİ' or statutory law is private Bar Association law and not the Law of the people". This is evidenced by the copyright in the title page of these now mere corporate By-laws ("as law" not real Law, mere policy/police). This is a serious revelation. But how can that be? How is it possible? WHEN!? If it can be shown that the Bar Association controls the law and its administration then it sits as an occupying force over Our territory. This must be exposed and overthrown or we the people shall surely succumb to the badge of servitude known as human resource or voluntary slavery! This is so under international common law concerning occupations! The question now, if this is true, is it too late?

But before you get on your horse to make your ride, there must be a glimpse of proof of this occupation. Before you declare, "The BRITISH ARE HERE. NO! THE BRITISH HAVE BEEN HERE!", you must have more proof. Is the ship of corporate "state" really in the harbor? Has a foreign occupying force silently and cunningly taken over your 'State' and Land? Surely you are insane to advance such an alarm without proof. If true the alarm must surely sound, but where to find this proof? Go to the "source", you think, the Oregon Revised Statutesİ 'ORSİ' contain a construction chapter. Maybe you'll find something there.

A Foreign Corporation?

You also notice, 174.520 General statutes enacted prior to January 12, 1953, repealed; exceptions. (1) All statute laws of Oregon of a general, public and permanent nature enacted prior to January 12, 1953, were repealed effective December 31, 1953." Not so permanent were they?
Yes, also you see the by-laws are "set forth after" HB 2. But what is HB 2? A computer search suggests only one piece of information. It tells you that HB 2 was called the "Model Business Corporation Act". You find yourself at the state archives building in Salem, Oregon, asking for help on this query.

Nothing turns up concerning the Act under that name so you inquiry of HB 2 and the laws prior. The archivist explains that prior to 1953 the records of Government activity are inconsistent, after 1953 the 'books and records' are complete. The archivist explains how to look for HB 2. He brings you the "Bill File Folder" for the year in question. You find HB 2 as the second Bill in the folder. It is an immense work of legalese measuring about an inch thick! You sit and read this securing in your mind the reason for your research; Proof of a foreign occupation. An invasion!

After hours of reading and your mind numb, it doesn't seem to make sense. What does this Bill have to do with the ORSİ? This law was put into the ORSİ of 1953, so you go to those volumes and find HB 2 codified at Chapter 57, Foreign Corporation. FOREIGN CORPORATION! What on earth can this have to do with the Law of the people? Curious, you get the current edition of the ORSİ "as laws" and look for Chapter 57. You see that in the current by-laws chapter 57 has been renumbered then repealed. Ok, so where did it go?

Substituted Law.

SUBSTITUTED LAW!!! And, look closely, it isn't even substituted, it really is "as substituted". (Just like your "money", it is not 'Money' specie. It works merely "as money". It is corporate debt scrip; as money, 'legal' tender.) You can't believe what you are reading, the law of the people 'as substituted' for the policy of a foreign corporation! In this scam, the Bar cleverly moves the substituted pea to yet another cup pouring it out as legitimate drink for consumption by the hand fed people. And as if by magic, the Law of the people, in their consuming stupor, disappears. The Bar Association authorized, the lawfulness of which is held questionable, through prior constitutional amendment, has over-taken the people and their self governing State of the State of Oregon with a mere 'state' called Oregon. {See the definition of "in the state"}(occupied?). This occupying force pursuant to international common laws governing territorial occupation, arguably, took the law as it found them in the occupied territory and using those laws altered the governance of the now occupied people. The servant and subject is YOU! And each of YOU and YOURS!!! And because you threw it off not, the yoke of this Beast is your burden! You cannot claim to be free suffering this adultery to freedom. The Law now requires all your intention to overthrow the oppressor or the last nail penetrates the coffin.

You remember this totalitarian and tyrannical condition being reflected in the Movie "Robo Cop", minus the special effects. Oregon is run by privateering corporate police and can be consider in all respects a police state! This is true for every state in the "union". The corporation called STATE OF OREGON is simply the most blatant and arrogant about this. Officials will tell you that what is written is 'state law', but what the lawyers write is really mere 'policy'. A policy state. This 'policy' contrivance is made more clear for example in "Driver License" requirements. This 'requirement" is just "social policy" and not a requirement under real Law and no requirement can be found. The constitution, a document creating a limited governance, does not give to the state or federal jurisdiction Power to force an association to do what by necessity you already naturally do. In fact, forced associations are prohibited by the Law of the Land if there be a living constitution today. That indicates we exist politically in a policy state. All you must do is change the "y" in 'policy' for an "e" to observe the real state; A police state. Can you see clearly now? Law and freedom dies in an occupation. It becomes just-Us, not you. In this case the lawyers and the judges of the Bar Association runs the show now. As they have said over and over again, it is "their" courtroom. Can you believe it now? You may not believe this is the fact but they aren't kidding. The only question now is do you continue to put up with this arrogance and inequitable inequality. Do you intend to exist in a truly free state? But how did this police state come about? How about the state of confusion?

Pea in a cup

Returning home to your computer search which indicated that HB 2 was a model business corporation act, you read more closely to see who submitted the Act for legislative approval. You finally find the instigator. The purpose of HB 2 did not fill any real need of the people or any one of them, it is the tool of none other than the Bar Association! Then once officially "in the state" the industrious Bar through legislative manipulation slid foreign corporation law under the cover of private (domestic) corporations law. The ORSİ is "set forth after" (under the authority) of HB 2 a 'model' act for foreign corporate business whose sole beneficial activity is political takeovers. The only authoring or interested 'entity' behind that Bill, HB 2, was and is the Bar Association. You are astonished?

In researching this further you find out that the pea will be hid in a new cup very shortly. Apparently, the lawyer legislators (Legislative Counsel) feel that the Bar Association is too high profile and the people are slowly ferreting out the facade so the members are conspiring to hide it were nobody will see it. The best place will be right under the nose of the people. It will be assimilated into the supreme court. This way it is out of sight, out of mind and absolutely insulated from direct accountability.

And this is one of the best of their under-handed tricks yet. Lawyers and judges have figured out how they can occupy your life unto its destruction and you cannot hold them accountable! In fact, the racketeers hold is so strong and absolute that one judge will protect another without a flinch of conscience. You have seen this before were the Federal court gives absolute immunity to judges and district attorneys. Remember, members of the Bar pursuant to their oath before admission are not to allow shame to befall the brotherhood, especially the shame connected with their conspiracy, theft, and pirateering. So much for your right of redress of grievance. But then again there are no such rights under a corporate police, just privileges, remember? Now that you can see this, do you wonder how you can let them get away with this?

For now you find compelling, too, the knowledge that the Bar originates in England, a private development corporation there. Is this enough proof though? You figure it won't hurt to check a couple of other things before confirming the pea in a cup.